Wordly Wise 3000 Book 11
Fourth Edition - Answer Key
Lesson 15
📜 Academic Honor Code
These answers are provided strictly for educational support and self-checking. Please use them responsibly to verify your understanding and learn from your mistakes, not as a shortcut for cheating. True learning comes from the effort you put in!
15A Understanding Meanings
p. 164(Possible answers; students' sentences may vary.)
- C
- C
- Concomitant events accompany a main event.
- C
- An oligarchy is a government controlled by a privileged elite.
- To entice someone is to attract that person by arousing desire.
- C
- An inordinate amount is one that is excessive.
- C
- C
- A repugnant suggestion offends or repulses its recipients.
- C
- C
- A redoubtable scholar is one whose credentials are worthy of respect.
- An arbiter is one whose decisions are accepted as final.
Click Next for 15B Using Words
<><>
15B Using Words
p. 166-
b. repugnant c. repugnant
-
b. inordinate c. inordinate
-
a. demur b. demur
-
a. entice c. entice
- a. redoubtable
Click Next for 15C Word Study: Analogies
<><>
15C Word Study: Analogies
p. 167- 1. b
- 2. b
- 3. d
- 4. b
- 5. d
- 6. a
- 7. a
- 8. c
- 9. b
- 10. a
Click Next for 15D Images of Words
<><>
15D Images of Words
p. 168- 1. b, c
- 2. b, c
- 3. a
- 4. b, c
- 5. a
- 6. c
- 7. b, c
- 8. a, b, c
- 9. No sentence suggests demur.
- 10. a, b, c
Click Next for 15E Vocabulary in Context
<><>
15E Vocabulary in Context
p. 170(Possible answers; students' sentences may vary.)
- These women were part of an oligarchy because they came from old, well-to-do families that possessed social and economic power and could easily exert an influence over city government.
- Her friends viewed her as an arbiter of fashion and followed her advice. Those who demurred were ostracized from the group.
- Sample response: If politeness, delicacy, and elegance were more important to Hemenway, she probably wouldn't have concerned herself with the origin of the aigrettes.
- The article gave graphic details about the slaughter of birds.
- The industry was excessive and inhumane in its treatment of birds, slaughtering close to five million of them each year.
- Concomitant with the laws would be the need for women to boycott the use of feathered adornments.
- They said it would cause an inordinate amount of hardship to workers in the feather industry.
- The senator was inimical to the proposal.
- They were not an exclusive group, but rather one that hoped to entice many people into joining their cause.
- People are more aware of the threat to different species and would be offended to see them killed for frivolous purposes.
End of Lesson 15
